Brief: This exercise involves filming and editing a character opening a door, crossing a room and sitting down in a chair opposite another character, with whom she/he then exchanges a couple of lines of dialogue. This task should demonstrate match on action, shot/reverse shot and the 180-degree rule.
Planning process and pre-production: The planning consisted of firstly devising a storyboard. The storyboard acts as a graphic organizer in the form of illustrations displayed in a desired sequence for the purpose of pre-visualizing the look of our clip. Next, we created a shot list based from the storyboard which consisted of a full log of all the shots we wanted to include in our clip. It was used essentially like a checklist and ensured a sense of direction whilst we were filming. Lastly, we devised the script. This helps us establish the narrative. What makes the script so crucial however is the fact that In them, the movement, actions, expression, and dialogues of the characters are also narrated. This is such a critical part of our pre-production as it enables our group to be decisive as we are now supplied elaborate detail so we are fully confident as to what our clip will consist of.
Strengths: To begin, I think that the strongest aspect of this clip is the use of humour. I felt that our clip ensured that the audience could genuinely enjoy watching the clip. Also, the use of enigma codes built tension and intrigued the audience. Along with this, the action codes created fear or humour. In addition, I felt that we successfully demonstrated all the key skills such as the 180-degree rule, match on action and shot reverse shot. Finally, I felt that the clip was well put together in the sense that our use of mine-en-scene was parallel to the visuals.
Weaknesses: However, this clip consisted of many weaknesses. For instance, I felt that it was too dependent on dialogue to explain the plot. At times, there were parts of the story missing such as how the protagonist arrived at the antagonist's house. Moreover, there is bad noise quality which is most prominent in the exterior scene at the beginning. This could have been due to the lack of use of the microphone on our persons. This same scene was filmed in the dark where lighting was not desirable, if we had filmed an hour earlier, we might have achieved a better feel. What really made our clip lack in quality was the fact that we had to use our mobile phones to film several scenes too. Additionally, I found that the editing was not fast paced enough. We could have built tension more steadily with better editing. Finally, our sound consisted primarily of non-digetic sound rather than diegetic which could have been used to add an interesting aspect to our clip.
Conclusion: To conclude, I think this clip is lacking vastly in any impressive cinematography but it manages to retain an interesting narrative. I also think we learnt a lot through all the mistakes we made, which is what ultimately makes this clip a successful attempt at the preliminary task.

